Talk:BPG Filling of Losses
Things to add/change[edit source]
This discussion page was started in July 2014 to collect ideas for improving the chapter. It includes the suggestions offered by the BPG Publications Committee, PCC Task Force in 2007-2009. Please feel free to add your own suggestions for improvement.
- Add discussion of arriving at desired pulp tone by mixing pre-cast pulp in primary colors.
At the Annual Meeting in 2015, a discussion group consisting of Denise Stockman, Anne Downey, Jessica Crane and Amy Hughes was formed to brainstorm ideas to update this chapter.
GENERAL:
- Expand "Purpose" statement.
- Some materials are outdated.
- Which ones specifically? --Sandrine Blais (talk) 18:24, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
- A lot of statements can be elaborated. They might be mis-understood in over-simplified form.
- This section should be thought of as an aesthetic activity. In contrast, "Filling by Lining" is stabilization.
- Overall I agree, but I still think the existing section about filling by lining is important on this page. You can add toned tissue during a lining still or have an overall toned lining paper as a visual compensation technique, which still falls under this page I feel. The more options on the page, the better --Sandrine Blais (talk) 17:34, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
- Language can be updated. Specific phrases to reconsider: "rotating shaft tool"; "fine linen handkerchief" and "sugar for toning".
- This information in this section will have a lot of overlap with Inpainting. Rather than merging, links can be added between the two.
- Materials can be integrated into a discussion of technique instead of in list form.
- I think a discussion could be good, but rather than removing the list I might prioritize adding photos or linking to the materials and equipment page --Sandrine Blais (talk) 17:34, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
- A section on digital fills should be added.
- Added! still needs to be tweaked --Sandrine Blais (talk) 17:34, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
- A section on temporary/ easily removable fills should be added.
- Expand the 'purpose' section to include more considerations: when/ why
- Remove the section on overall lining section.
- Reconsider this technique in fills shaped by dry western paper: "Teasing fibers at the loss edge of artifact..."
- Coffee and tea are no longer used for toning. Toning through heat is no longer used.
- Moved to historical section --Sandrine Blais (talk) 18:24, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
Headers that could be added at some point in the future with content[edit source]
These sections were either on the page or on the discussion page and were empty, so I deleted them but wanted to preserve them here: Special Considerations, Temporary/ Easily Removable, Structurally Unattached, Overlay --Sandrine Blais (talk) 16:37, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
Clean up of talk page[edit source]
- This whole talk page needs to be compared to the actual page to see which version to keep, then the talk page needs to be cleaned up --Sandrine Blais (talk) 18:34, 27 November 2025 (UTC)
- In November 2025, there was a re-organization of the main page planned on the Talk page, which I agreed with overall. I implemented the changes that were planned here and deleted the draft from the Talk page, in order to see people's suggestions more easily. --Sandrine Blais (talk) 17:34, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
Digital fills[edit source]
I added a whole section about digital fills using a project I did a few years ago. I feel like this maybe should exist as a blogpost instead and be linked here, so this section might change in the near future --Sandrine Blais (talk) 18:34, 27 November 2025 (UTC)
